root/llama.cpp
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp.git synced 2024-12-27 03:44:35 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 4 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
8a86b95e87
llama.cpp/ggml-quants.h

235 lines
10 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
#pragma once
ggml : factor all quantization code in ggml-quants ggml-ci
2023-10-28 14:05:07 +00:00
// This is a private API for quantization and dequantization
// Should not be used directly, use ggml.h instead
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
#include "ggml.h"
#include <stdint.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <stddef.h>
ggml : fix static_assert with older compilers #2024 (#2218)
2023-07-14 18:55:56 +00:00
#ifndef static_assert
#if defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 201100L)
#define static_assert(cond, msg) _Static_assert(cond, msg)
#else
#define static_assert(cond, msg) struct global_scope_noop_trick
#endif
#endif
ggml : factor all quantization code in ggml-quants ggml-ci
2023-10-28 14:05:07 +00:00
#define QK4_0 32
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d; // delta
uint8_t qs[QK4_0 / 2]; // nibbles / quants
} block_q4_0;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q4_0) == sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK4_0 / 2, "wrong q4_0 block size/padding");
#define QK4_1 32
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d; // delta
ggml_fp16_t m; // min
uint8_t qs[QK4_1 / 2]; // nibbles / quants
} block_q4_1;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q4_1) == 2 * sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK4_1 / 2, "wrong q4_1 block size/padding");
#define QK5_0 32
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d; // delta
uint8_t qh[4]; // 5-th bit of quants
uint8_t qs[QK5_0 / 2]; // nibbles / quants
} block_q5_0;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q5_0) == sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + sizeof(uint32_t) + QK5_0 / 2, "wrong q5_0 block size/padding");
#define QK5_1 32
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d; // delta
ggml_fp16_t m; // min
uint8_t qh[4]; // 5-th bit of quants
uint8_t qs[QK5_1 / 2]; // nibbles / quants
} block_q5_1;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q5_1) == 2 * sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + sizeof(uint32_t) + QK5_1 / 2, "wrong q5_1 block size/padding");
#define QK8_0 32
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d; // delta
int8_t qs[QK8_0]; // quants
} block_q8_0;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q8_0) == sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK8_0, "wrong q8_0 block size/padding");
#define QK8_1 32
typedef struct {
float d; // delta
float s; // d * sum(qs[i])
int8_t qs[QK8_1]; // quants
} block_q8_1;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q8_1) == 2*sizeof(float) + QK8_1, "wrong q8_1 block size/padding");
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
//
// Super-block quantization structures
//
ggml : factor all quantization code in ggml-quants ggml-ci
2023-10-28 14:05:07 +00:00
// Super-block size
#ifdef GGML_QKK_64
#define QK_K 64
#define K_SCALE_SIZE 4
#else
#define QK_K 256
#define K_SCALE_SIZE 12
#endif
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// 2-bit quantization
// weight is represented as x = a * q + b
k-quants : fix comments about block sizing (#3499)
2023-10-08 10:21:19 +00:00
// 16 blocks of 16 elements each
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// Effectively 2.5625 bits per weight
typedef struct {
uint8_t scales[QK_K/16]; // scales and mins, quantized with 4 bits
uint8_t qs[QK_K/4]; // quants
ggml_fp16_t d; // super-block scale for quantized scales
ggml_fp16_t dmin; // super-block scale for quantized mins
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
} block_q2_K;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q2_K) == 2*sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK_K/16 + QK_K/4, "wrong q2_K block size/padding");
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// 3-bit quantization
// weight is represented as x = a * q
k-quants : fix comments about block sizing (#3499)
2023-10-08 10:21:19 +00:00
// 16 blocks of 16 elements each
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// Effectively 3.4375 bits per weight
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
#ifdef GGML_QKK_64
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
typedef struct {
uint8_t hmask[QK_K/8]; // quants - high bit
uint8_t qs[QK_K/4]; // quants - low 2 bits
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
uint8_t scales[2];
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
ggml_fp16_t d; // super-block scale
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
} block_q3_K;
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
static_assert(sizeof(block_q3_K) == sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK_K / 4 + QK_K / 8 + 2, "wrong q3_K block size/padding");
#else
typedef struct {
uint8_t hmask[QK_K/8]; // quants - high bit
uint8_t qs[QK_K/4]; // quants - low 2 bits
uint8_t scales[12]; // scales, quantized with 6 bits
ggml_fp16_t d; // super-block scale
} block_q3_K;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q3_K) == sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK_K / 4 + QK_K / 8 + 12, "wrong q3_K block size/padding");
#endif
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// 4-bit quantization
k-quants : fix comments about block sizing (#3499)
2023-10-08 10:21:19 +00:00
// 8 blocks of 32 elements each
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// weight is represented as x = a * q + b
// Effectively 4.5 bits per weight
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
#ifdef GGML_QKK_64
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d[2]; // super-block scales/mins
uint8_t scales[2]; // 4-bit block scales/mins
uint8_t qs[QK_K/2]; // 4--bit quants
} block_q4_K;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q4_K) == 2*sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK_K/2 + 2, "wrong q4_K block size/padding");
#else
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d; // super-block scale for quantized scales
ggml_fp16_t dmin; // super-block scale for quantized mins
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
uint8_t scales[K_SCALE_SIZE]; // scales and mins, quantized with 6 bits
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
uint8_t qs[QK_K/2]; // 4--bit quants
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
} block_q4_K;
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
static_assert(sizeof(block_q4_K) == 2*sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + K_SCALE_SIZE + QK_K/2, "wrong q4_K block size/padding");
#endif
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// 5-bit quantization
k-quants : fix comments about block sizing (#3499)
2023-10-08 10:21:19 +00:00
// 8 blocks of 32 elements each
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// weight is represented as x = a * q + b
// Effectively 5.5 bits per weight
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
#ifdef GGML_QKK_64
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d; // super-block scale
int8_t scales[QK_K/16]; // 8-bit block scales
uint8_t qh[QK_K/8]; // quants, high bit
uint8_t qs[QK_K/2]; // quants, low 4 bits
} block_q5_K;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q5_K) == sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK_K/2 + QK_K/8 + QK_K/16, "wrong q5_K block size/padding");
#else
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
typedef struct {
ggml_fp16_t d; // super-block scale for quantized scales
ggml_fp16_t dmin; // super-block scale for quantized mins
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
uint8_t scales[K_SCALE_SIZE]; // scales and mins, quantized with 6 bits
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
uint8_t qh[QK_K/8]; // quants, high bit
uint8_t qs[QK_K/2]; // quants, low 4 bits
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
} block_q5_K;
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower than the scalar implementation) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080, 20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of these 20% is due to that, * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660, 16% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660, 10% slower on 4080. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on CUDA. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q6_K working on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights. With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although performance is not quite there. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON. We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version. * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights * We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal compiler * Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms) * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms). * k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms). * k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal * k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp * Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition * Simplify via lambda * k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this quantization type. There is some very slight loss in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%. E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is 8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit, while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G. * k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64 Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K, but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on the perplexity vs size curve. * k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit * k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64 Still needs AVX2 implementation * k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K * k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product * k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 16:43:07 +00:00
static_assert(sizeof(block_q5_K) == 2*sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + K_SCALE_SIZE + QK_K/2 + QK_K/8, "wrong q5_K block size/padding");
#endif
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// 6-bit quantization
// weight is represented as x = a * q
k-quants : fix comments about block sizing (#3499)
2023-10-08 10:21:19 +00:00
// 16 blocks of 16 elements each
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// Effectively 6.5625 bits per weight
typedef struct {
uint8_t ql[QK_K/2]; // quants, lower 4 bits
uint8_t qh[QK_K/4]; // quants, upper 2 bits
int8_t scales[QK_K/16]; // scales, quantized with 8 bits
ggml_fp16_t d; // super-block scale
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
} block_q6_K;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q6_K) == sizeof(ggml_fp16_t) + QK_K / 16 + 3*QK_K/4, "wrong q6_K block size/padding");
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// This is only used for intermediate quantization and dot products
typedef struct {
float d; // delta
int8_t qs[QK_K]; // quants
int16_t bsums[QK_K/16]; // sum of quants in groups of 16
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
} block_q8_K;
static_assert(sizeof(block_q8_K) == sizeof(float) + QK_K + QK_K/16*sizeof(int16_t), "wrong q8_K block size/padding");
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// Quantization
ggml : factor all quantization code in ggml-quants ggml-ci
2023-10-28 14:05:07 +00:00
void quantize_row_q4_0_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q4_0 * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q4_1_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q4_1 * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q5_0_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q5_0 * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q5_1_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q5_1 * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q8_0_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q8_0 * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q8_1_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q8_1 * restrict y, int k);
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
void quantize_row_q2_K_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q2_K * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q3_K_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q3_K * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q4_K_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q4_K * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q5_K_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q5_K * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q6_K_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q6_K * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q8_K_reference(const float * restrict x, block_q8_K * restrict y, int k);
ggml : factor all quantization code in ggml-quants ggml-ci
2023-10-28 14:05:07 +00:00
void quantize_row_q4_0(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q4_1(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q5_0(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q5_1(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q8_0(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q8_1(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
void quantize_row_q2_K(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q3_K(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q4_K(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q5_K(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q6_K(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
void quantize_row_q8_K(const float * restrict x, void * restrict y, int k);
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// Dequantization
ggml : factor all quantization code in ggml-quants ggml-ci
2023-10-28 14:05:07 +00:00
void dequantize_row_q4_0(const block_q4_0 * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q4_1(const block_q4_1 * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q5_0(const block_q5_0 * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q5_1(const block_q5_1 * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q8_0(const block_q8_0 * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
//void dequantize_row_q8_1(const block_q8_1 * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
void dequantize_row_q2_K(const block_q2_K * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q3_K(const block_q3_K * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q4_K(const block_q4_K * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q5_K(const block_q5_K * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q6_K(const block_q6_K * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
void dequantize_row_q8_K(const block_q8_K * restrict x, float * restrict y, int k);
ggml : add SOTA 2,3,4,5,6 bit k-quantizations (#1684) * Starting to add k-quantization to ggml I think it is better to have quantization separate from ggml. For now just adding the k-quants there, but it would be better to also factor out the existing ggml quantizations. * Adding Q3_K and Q8_K (de)-quantization * Q3_K now working on CUDA and AVX2/scalar CUDA is not ideal - ~50% slower than Q4_0 for single token prediction, about the same in batch mode (perplexity). CPU single token is ~55 ms (on Ryzen 7950X). * Some improvement for Q3_K on CUDA It is now ~22.5 ms/token on my GPU, so ~30% slower than Q4_0. * Some more CUDA optimizations for Q3_K Single token is now 20.5 ms/token (~20% slower than Q4_0). Perplexity is on par with Q4_0. * Adding Q4_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is the same or perhaps very slightly better than Q4_0 on the CPU. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~10% better than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity is about the same). * Adding Q6_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~40% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 6-bit model is ~44% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is ~6% lower than Q4_0, batch mode (perplexity) is even closer (but still slower). * Adding Q5_K - scalar, AVX2, CUDA Performance is ~20% lower compared to Q4_K on the CPU. This is to be expected, considering that we are memory bound on the CPU and the 5-bit model is ~22% larger than the 4-bit. On the GPU, single token prediction is about the same as Q4_0 for both, single token and batch prediction. * Per convention, all QX_K quantizations use Q5_K for output.weight * Adding quantization mixes * Quantization mixes: didn't quite get what I wanted in the last commit * Q4_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q6_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Q5_K dot product for ARM_NEON * Adding Q3_K dot for ARM_NEON It is 22% slower than Q4_K, despite the smaller model size. On x86_64, where we are memory bound, the Q3_K model is quite a bit faster than Q4_K. * A very slightly faster ARM_NEON Q3_K dot * Adding Q2_K - just CUDA for now Token prediction is pretty good - about 15.5 ms on a RTX 4080. Perplexity is about the same as Q4_K. * Adding scalar and AVX2 Q2_K dot * Adding ARM_NEON Q2_K dot About the same performance as Q4_K. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON Q2_K dot Single token prediction is now ~36 ms on M2 Max. The code is much simpler too. * Fixed bug in Q2_K CUDA dot product kernel Stranegly enough, for the few prompts I tried with the 7B model the responses looked perfectly reasonable. Only realized something is not quite right when I tried the larger models and started getting nonse back. In any case, Q2_K single token evaluation time on an RTX 4080 in a Ryzen7950X box iusing CUDA and model fully loaded on the GPU are ~15.5 ms for 7B, ~25.4 ms for 13B, and ~55.8 ms for 30B. The max number of layers that fit in VRAM for The 65B is 32. With that, we get ~330 ms per token, which is not that much faster than just running on the CPU (~470 ms per token). * Don't print zeros/NaNs when no count histogram has been collected * A 10% faster CUDA vector dot kernel for Q3_K Q3_K is now running at ~18.5 ms / token on CUDA, so the gap to Q4_0 is only 10%. It seems memory acccess pattern is more important for performance than the amount of computation the kernel does. * A slightly daster Q4_K AVX2 dot product For perplexity, where we are less memory bound, time per pass drops by ~5%. Barely measurable difference for single token prediction. * A slightly faster ARM_NEON A4_K dot product * Minor * Fix quantization error test We cannot possibly be expecting rmse < 0.002 for 2- and 3-bit quantization variants. * Fix docker build I have been sloppy with vector reinterpret casts on ARM_NEON. It seems clang is very forgiving in that regard. * Added forgotten ggml.o dependence on k_quants.h to the Makefile * Had unintentionally committed the Makefile with -Ofast enabled * ggml : rename k_quants -> ggml-quants-k, use lowercase in code --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 19:56:18 +00:00
// Dot product
ggml : factor all quantization code in ggml-quants ggml-ci
2023-10-28 14:05:07 +00:00
void ggml_vec_dot_q4_0_q8_0(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
void ggml_vec_dot_q4_1_q8_1(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
void ggml_vec_dot_q5_0_q8_0(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
void ggml_vec_dot_q5_1_q8_1(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
void ggml_vec_dot_q8_0_q8_0(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
k-quants : allow to optionally disable at compile time (#1734) * k-quants : put behind optional compile flag LLAMA_K_QUANTS * build : enable k-quants by default
2023-06-07 07:59:52 +00:00
void ggml_vec_dot_q2_K_q8_K(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
void ggml_vec_dot_q3_K_q8_K(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
void ggml_vec_dot_q4_K_q8_K(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
void ggml_vec_dot_q5_K_q8_K(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
void ggml_vec_dot_q6_K_q8_K(int n, float * restrict s, const void * restrict vx, const void * restrict vy);
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink